Archive for December, 2008

privatize only what…

Monday, December 22nd, 2008

Over at dailykos.com they are talking about how bad Bush the Lesser has made the air traffic control system. One of the many “wonderful” ideas was privatization.

In the argument about bigger government and private enterprise, people miss the key points.

privatize only what you can afford to fail

Private enterprise is all about enabling people to take risks (and potentially failing) in return for a higher reward.

90% of new businesses fail. Usually in the first year. Can the US afford that kind of failure rate at “private” Air Traffic Control centers?

If not, then the US will be forced to subsidize the “private” ATCs that would otherwise suffer normal business failings.

Privatize only where you can afford to allow favoritism

Being successful is all about picking the businesses target audience and only serving those customers. A auto mechanic may decide to specialize in just BMWs. Can we afford to have an air traffic control system that specializes in just Boeing aircraft and does not handle flights using Airbus equipment?

Frosting!

Friday, December 5th, 2008

Look dad, there is frosting on the grass!

Frosting the snowman….

- The kids … got to love them!

Peak oil: Long-term price of oil is $0/barrel

Friday, December 5th, 2008

Every time the price of oil drops, the oil ostriches claim that the price drop “proves” that Peak oil does not exist. However, just like gravity which exists no matter what we want to “believe”, peak oil is a reality.

Peak oil can easily demonstrated by these questions:

  1. Q: How much new crude is being made (not “discovered”) MADE?

    A: 0 — no plants being buried, compressed, and converted to oil (at least not at a very fast rate)
  2. Q: What is the replacement rate of new production to old production?

    A: Negative. Most “new” production is just squeeze more drops out of old well-known fields.

  3. Q: What is the growth on demand?

    A: Exponentially increasing as China and India start buying more cars.
  4. Q: What does the SHORT-term price have to do with increasing the amount of crude that the world contains?

    A: Nothing. The planet Earth doesn’t look at the price and decide that it is going to convert more of its carbon into oil.

  5. Q: What does the LONG-term price have to do with increasing the amount of crude that the world contains?

    A: Nothing. (See previous question).

  6. Q: What is the price of oil based on?

    A: Price is based on the BELIEF about the VALUE that OTHERS place (not just scarcity) on the item and has nothing to do with its ACTUAL availability. If the world doesn’t believe something is valuable then the price might be quite low even though the available of that good is quite low.

    For example, how many native Navajo speakers are out there? Probably a few hundred. What is the PRICE that a Navajo speaker can charge because of that scarcity? Not much — because the world doesn’t value that skill.

    If aliens were to land tomorrow and it turned out that those 3-eyed creatures spoke Navajo — then of course the PRICE for a Navajo speaker would skyrocket.

  7. Q: What is the price of a passenger pigeon? (Hint: they are extinct)

    A: $0 — The price of something that does not exist is $0. If something does not exist, then the price is $0. The price of oil can be priced at $5/barrel until the last barrel is sold. And then the price is $0. But price is not the same as scarcity.

I will make a pricing prediction for you. In 2075 the price of oil will be $0…. because

oil.
will.
not.
exist.

There will be no price because you can’t set a price on something that does not exist!

Economics 101:

Price = PERCEIVED-VALUE / AVAILABILITY

If the availability is zero then the price is not infinite, the price is ZERO.

If the PERCEIVED-VALUE is zero then the availability doesn’t matter and the price is once again …. ZERO.

Value only increases availability when there is an infinite supply of the good.

Crude oil is not infinite.

California High-Speed Rail go direct to SFO

Wednesday, December 3rd, 2008

Clem is talking about how hard Millbrae is thanks to Quentin Kopp’s mucked up “leadership” when the original BART-to-SFO disaster was “designed” and built.

Now with California High-Speed Rail a real possibility, CHSRA should just do what should have been done all along. Route Caltrain (and now HSR) to SFO.

This map shows how it can be done right:

View Larger Map

Benefits:

  • Problematic stations are avoid ( South San Francisco, San Bruno, Millbrae, Broadway).
  • Problematic 70-mph San Bruno Curve avoid (+ thorny question of taking someone’s house).
  • Direct SFO stop
  • A unified People Mover, BART, Caltrain/HSR stop — people coming from the East Bay (Oakland Airport??) would have little to no transfers.
  • The Baby Bullet trains would now also be a Airport Express train for people coming from the South Bay/Peninsula. (instead of the 33-step Millbrae disaster)
  • More of a direct connection to the actual terminal the passenger is flying into /out of.
  • Airport workers from the Peninsula/South Bay could now take a single train to get to work — instead of 33-step Millbrae disaster.
  • Update: Also this avoids fighting with 4 cities ( Burlingame, Millbrae, San Bruno, South San Francisco) as impacts to those cities are avoid almost entirely.

Is this likely to happen?

Well considering that Quentin Kopp is running CHSRA

“Wasting fuel” option myth

Wednesday, December 3rd, 2008

How come otherwise intelligent people assume that fuel inefficiency is a desired feature in cars, SUVs, and trucks?

Do SUV buyers go to dealers and look for the car with the LEAST fuel efficiency?

Car salesperson: Hi, can I help you?

SUV buyer: Yes, I am looking for a vehicle that gets less than 11mpg. The Honda dealer across the street has a truck that gets 12mpg and I am looking for something that gets even lower mpg. Can you help me?

Car salesperson: Well of course! With this F-6705 we include a trailer hitch and matching trailer of concrete. We guarantee that that your mpg will be 4 mpg or lower!

SUV buyer: Dang! Where do I sign!

The reality is that if a consumer could buy a F150 that got 50mpg, they would buy it!

Since when is wasting money a optional “feature”?

Separate out the desire for big vehicles from the NON-desire to spend money on gas!